Now & Then
  • Home
  • Conversation Central
  • Bombardment
  • Home
  • Conversation Central
  • Bombardment
Please Note: Comment Approval is normally undertaken twice a day as time & circumstances permit.

Please check out yesternoir.org:  HERE.

Frankenstein's Scientific Monsters

22/10/2022

78 Comments

 
Dr. John Campbell has 2.48Million subscribers on YouTube and has been an incredible source of detailed information throughout the pandemic (plandemic, lab leak or whatever).  His academic qualifications in science are matched by a career in medicine that leaves me confident he knows a thing or two on COVID, to put it mildly.

The fact that YouTube have threatened to close down his account recently suggests that he is well and truly 'over the target'. YouTube is beyond doubt in my opinion just another mainstream media manipulator who grew fat on people like Dr John Campbell, and now needs to keep in line with their masters narrative.

To quote him "Please share this video, this research must STOP. Gain of function research in the USA today using enhanced potential pandemic pathogen (ePPP) research."

Please listen & learn, this is not anti-vax nonsense, this is the real world we live in and if not for you, for your children, we all need to wake up!

78 Comments
Mervyn Hagger
23/10/2022 12:46:36 pm

The video of the leader of China removing his competitor - quite deliberately on video - was to warn all competitors that China will not disintegrate like the USSR - so before 'enlightenment' begins - it is crushed. This happened in Tiananmen Square and again in Hong Kong.

The problem in the UK is that there is body of power that is the law that is above everything and everyone. It is called the Crown.

In the USA, ever since 1900, the US Navy in competition with the Royal Navy has bypassed the US Constitution with martial law applied in blobs. Ollie North was going to get FEMA to extend this power - even using a ship-born radio station as part of his plans - but Ronald Reagan stepped in when papers like the Fort Worth Star Telegram splashed it on their front pages.

My group were on cable TV and on both legal and pirate stations. In the UK the idiot anoraks said "shut up" let's discuss music - just like Malcolm Smith's tribe of dumb-asses today.

What this means is that the miliary are in charge and you have no hope of stopping them. Truss and Johnson are beholden not to voters in the UK but to the US industrial military complex.

Eisenhower warned everyone what was about to happen and the world said ....

SHUT THE FUCK UP AND PLAY MORE MUSIC!

The BBC is celebrating 95 years and calling it 100 while replaying snippets of what it stands for ....

E N T E R T A I N M E N T

Shut up Mike WIlson you are scaring us to death - says Fred Bramley and Co.

Reply
David Cotter
23/10/2022 10:34:38 pm

I don't think that because a group or an individual want to discuss or involve themselves with music they are, as you so eloquently put it, 'dumb-asses'. They have their pursuits and causes, you have yours. It is not reasonable to expect anyone to join your tribe and to insult them when they don't, just because you would wish them to.

In stark contrast, Mike's posts present a case, but he does not attack anyone. Your response invariably is to insult and deride whomsoever you have determined to be this week's target. I very much doubt whether the content of this blog is scaring anyone, although I know you are fond of saying that this and your own writings do so.

Next point, the BBC and others have acknowledged in broadcasts and in print that 2022 is the 100th anniversary of the inception of the British Broadcasting Company Limited prior to the formation of the Corporation, so I'm not sure hat your point is.


Reply
Mervyn Hagger
25/10/2022 09:08:50 am

David Cotter. I am not exactly sure who you are or what little rock you crawled out from, under another name, but you didn't just suddenly appear.

Who are you, and why are YOU suddenly taking over from Fred Bramley and Peter Moore and company - both of which are FAKE identities?

Now the reason why such contempt is being thrown your way is because YOU are a mouthpiece for CENSORSHIP = PROPAGANDA.

YOUR interpretation of 'Your BBC' is not what is on the BBC screen.

I have very recently (since we began exposing their 100 years big lie), begun to notice a tiny bit of unrelated silent film showing a nameplate with the British Broadcasting Company on it. But the BBC Crown corporation has NO legal claim to the claim that it is related to the commercial BBC.

Managing Director John Reith broke the law regarding his fiduciary duties to shareholders (over 200 of them), when he started wearing two hats.

The BBC company went out of business in 1929 with John Reith presiding over it while also wearing the competitive hat as Director General of the Crown BBC.

Either you are a total looney - A FOOL LIKE PAUL RUSLING who STOLE from us to prop up the big Ronan O'Rahilly LIE - and fixation on a 6 years old girl (very sinister), or you are a patsy working for some part of the BBC or related industry or even a low level government office and you are trying to stop the truth from coming out.

You can't David Cotter, and because you are a fool and a deceptive fool at that, I personally have NO interest in discussing anything with you because you are in the pay at some low level of the very elements that I and the group I represent are going to expose as frauds, as liars, as cheats, and possibly in the case of the now dead Ronan O'Rahilly, something far, far worse.

I won't tip my hand any more than I have done up until now, but the true story is now known and it is just a matter of assembling the hard evidence to PROVE that story is true and that YOU and PAUL RUSLING are frauds.

Even Malcolm Smith is not in the ranks of the stupid.

That is why Garry Stevens is at war with him.

Malcolm is merely a tiny speck playing his own little business game using idiots to pay for his little insignificant radio venture, because it will eventually provide Malcolm with a genuine source of PERSONAL income once he is able to transition away from the begging bowl aimed at twerps like James McGregor.

No David, for you I have total contempt, unless you are Malcolm under yet another fake name.

If you are not Malcolm Smith, then you David are a but another useful fool in the hands of someone. If you are Malcolm, then hats off to Malcolm, because you even more devious than I thought you were. and thus your little financial venture might succeed.

Garry Neville Granville Gascoin III
23/10/2022 10:42:37 pm

It's open all hours for all comers at Arkrights new improved convenience board

At least Longwave sticks to one name, Hobbybore

Stevens and his moderator priviledged McGregor accolites are vying for who can think up the most stupid alias yet

Peter Moore dose think free entertainment enjoy the tennis girls knickers getting twisted

Reply
David Cotter
25/10/2022 05:59:32 pm

Just so you know:

I do not comment under another name. It is my own.
I am not 'taking over' from anyone.
I am not a mouthpiece for anyone, least of all censorship or propaganda. My comments are my own.
I do not work for BBC or a related industry.
I do not work for a low level government office.
I am not in the pay of anyone.
I am not Malcolm under a false name.
I am not in the hands of anyone.

Unlike you, neither am I trying a new and unfounded and unevidenced tack to attempt to further smear the name of Ronan O'Rahilly, nor creeping to Malcolm Smith in the hope that he will give up information for your book(s).

Without wishing to sound immodest, what I am is a rational, intelligent human being who sees through your modus operandi and causes you to shut down every discussion on which we are involved because I have called you out. The alternative, of course, is to ignore you like the rest of mankind.

Regarding the BBC issue, you have exposed nothing. Try something else.

James McGregor
30/10/2022 01:01:04 am

"I have very recently (since we began exposing their 100 years big lie), begun to notice a tiny bit of unrelated silent film showing a nameplate with the British Broadcasting Company on it. But the BBC Crown corporation has NO legal claim to the claim that it is related to the commercial BBC."

Is there some Charlie Chaplinesque point being made here by the great dicator Hagger?

A spark in the dark
23/10/2022 07:36:48 pm

Frankenstein's scientific monster!.
James McGregor?.
oh yes!.

Reply
James Frankenstein
23/10/2022 09:25:11 pm

No, James McGregor is not a Frankenstein, he is just an idiot drifting in an out of sanity - like Joe Biden. Both think they are smart. Both are loons manipulated by others.

It's your life James but no one will turn you into a book or a movie. You are boring.

Reply
Doctor soap dentist
24/10/2022 04:06:27 pm

Try harder Agb and Scottg

Reply
Someone you need to know
24/10/2022 01:43:46 pm

Lots of conspiracy theories abound and they seem to lack credibility because they don't name names. Well here's one for you:

David R. Malpass (@DavidMalpassWBG), was selected as 13th President of the World Bank Group by its Board of Executive Directors on April 5, 2019.

If you want to know what the World Bank / IMF is concerned about, you should be following them, not the BBC. Here's Malpass' WB/IMF web address: https://president.worldbankgroup.org/en/president

Follow that link if you want to see who has the money and what the real money people are most concerned about. Right now it is Africa, not Europe with its Ukrainian war, or Russia or China.

One reason is because Africa has all of the raw materials needed by the advanced world of tomorrow. Right now Africa is still being robbed blind, but the WB/IMF has to keep it from boiling over into a world problem.

Guess where the disease factories are really based?

In Africa, home of a lot of tin-pot dictators who are as Black as Black can be, and as exploitive of fellow Africans as the slave traders of old.

If you want to stop starvation and slavery and racism and yes, disease, then look to see where the raw materials are coming from that build the electric cars now coming on the market with increasing numbers.

Then ask who is financing this move to so-called 'Green' energy.

Maybe the people who call it green should really be honest and call it black as in Black people in Africa. They are the people being explointed, not 'Green' people because Green people don't exist.

So the WB/IMF who control this World's Money, are also the people messing around with diseases which could thin out those people in Africa because most of them do not even have basic health care.

Slavery is good for the modern world and so is disease control if it wipes out all of those human being who keep getting in the way of the folks exploiting Africa's minerals.

Oops, does that include YOU?

Reply
David Cotter
24/10/2022 11:00:25 pm

Interesting.

Can you expand on the 'disease factory' issue? Where exactly are they and who operates them? Some links to credible evidence would be good as I'd like to know more.

Reply
Who is David Cotter
25/10/2022 05:15:09 pm

This lazy git wants info and provides none. Who is he?

Mervyn Hagger
25/10/2022 09:26:51 am

Several offshore DJs got nabbed for sex crimes and some went to prison.

But when the story of Ronan O'Rahilly's interest as an adult in a 6 years old little girl is looked afresh, then it raises a question about what was going on inside Ronan O'Rahilly's head?

You will notice that Jocelyn Stevens did not embark on that lie. Neither did Ian Cowper Ross - he just made up another lie about his dad.

So who exactly parroted the big lie about Caroline Kennedy? Well Chris Moore fell for it and blabbed it all over the Sunday press in the USA. We have the proof. But then, after being promised a paying job by Ronan O'Rahilly that promise was unmasked as an empty promise, so he sued Ronan O'Rahilly thinking that Ronan O'Rahilly had been telling the truth.

Ian Cowper Ross knew that Ronan O'Rahilly was a con man which is now something that Malcolm Smith has begun to tell in machine gun bursts, because the stupid, brain dead anoraks won't listen to the truth, even when Malcolm Smith tells them the truth about Ronan O'Rahilly.

Malcolm may be devious, but he has street knowledge that lifts him out of the gutter of anorak wasted lives. Malcolm is no financial genius, he is a transitioning grease monkey. Good for him.

James McGregor and Fred Bramley and Garry Stevens and Dave Martin and all the rest are just fading fools who seem to lack the brain power of Malcolm.

But let's not forgot that it was Ronan O'Rahilly who invented and then pushed his fixation on a 6 years old little girl as his reason for being. His so-called interest in JFK is a joke.

JFK went to Ireland - where was Ronan O'Rahilly?

No, Ronan wasn't interested in JFK the man, or even Jackie his wife.

Ronan O'Rahilly was the ONLY PERSON prattling on as an adult about a 6 years old little girl.

Hello Jimmy Saville and company, you had company but no one seems to have noticed that very obvious connection.

Reply
David Cotter
25/10/2022 06:01:58 pm

This is a subject that you seem to enjoy shoehorning into any possible scenario. Hmmm.....

Reply
Pocket Lawyer Twerp
26/10/2022 10:40:20 pm

I would be bloody careful mentioning those two names in the same sentences of insinuation. Look how much Malcolm and Copeland and whoever Day has sued yesterday had to pay out

Reply
Thank you Malcolm Smith
25/10/2022 11:05:12 am

Your latest comments on the Dave Martin board are marvelous and deserve to be part of a book showing how stupid the latter 'Radio Caroline' operation was and why it had no connection with the original version in 1964. Neither did it have any impact the way that the original Laser did, thanks to the politically astute Charlie Wolf.

Reply
David Cotter
25/10/2022 06:05:38 pm

Mervyn, why don't you just ask him to contribute to your book? It's not like you've ever said anything against him - except for accusing him of fraud, deceit and theft, of course, but I'm sure he'll overlook that to further your interests.

Reply
David Cotter's Mum
26/10/2022 08:56:53 pm

You don't get it, do you David?

3656 Khz. House Martins Harmonicas on full chirp alert!
26/10/2022 10:26:14 pm

Oh my god ‘Rock Steady Eddie’ as he was known. I recall Nigel sent him up to the Libyan Embassy (all expenses paid) on another imaginary trip to see the non existent ‘David’. As Eddie lived close to a Caroline watering hole we thought we’d take a look to see if the lights were on in his bed sit overlooking the sea. Sure enough they were, with the shadow of Eddie moving behind the curtains.

One of the strange characters in the fruitcake that was Caroline at the time and an example of the desperation to get a piece of paper that might offer some form of operational security.

Now I have that piece of Ofcom Charity paper I feel very secure in spending my remaining days running anyone I can think of from the good old days into the toilet of my cottaging industry

Labour MP Chris Bryant told the Guardian: “Eddie is more than capable of defending herself and has run more marathons for charity than this chap could ever manage, but what I don’t understand is why playground bullies always think they are God’s gift to humanity and that LGBT folk are just waiting to pounce on them in the loo.

“Talk about delusional!”

The Butterfly Upon A Wheel mystery often asked in FAQ might have been answered yesterday by naming and shaming someone rhyming with Libby or Rich Anorak

Aside from the starmmer do you remember my old friend John? Then there was the bloke who seemed so nice and normal when I met him, but as soon as he got on the sinking leadership he said something like ' You are all instruments of the Devil and I have been sent to save you ',

Mad fecking days !

PM.

Reply
No one at all who had the best three days of his life on the Orion Life belt?
28/10/2022 03:42:00 pm

Re: Oh, here we go again.

Posted by Ian B on 25/10/2022, 16:04:56, in reply to "Re: Oh, here we go again."
A mate of mine who was onboard in 1987 told me there was a guy who, for his first programme, was doing the overnights. A few of the crew were relaxing upstairs when someone noticed that 558 was silent! On going down to the studio the record had finished on the turntable and there was no sign of the presenter. Non stop music was played and a search ensued to find him. Eventually he was located in a hidey hole at the from of the ship. He had been freaked out by the enormity of being on Caroline and couldn't handle it. He stayed in his cabin until the next tender arrived and left never to return.

Reply
Doctor soap opera
28/10/2022 03:47:32 pm

Since the outbreak of ISP we are seeing many many more head cases of David's son disease and not much Ebola Day. More reaserch needed before I read my paper

Reply
Howdya like them apples?
29/10/2022 03:26:11 pm

Posted by Fred Bramley on October 29, 2022, 12:16 am, in reply to "Re: David MD / LW"

PRS #1 snitch @DavidHine1
Mervyn's moderator & adopted
proof-reader pulpfiction.pdf
"Dial 999 for Caroline" crank



Reply
The G board manager
30/10/2022 12:56:21 am

Well dose Fred. This is 100% unreadably correct

Reply
Paper back writer
29/10/2022 05:21:32 pm

In my mind the problem with Moore is that he has changed from reciting the usual anecdotes anoraks love, like so and so was a unnamed spanner, to now naming names with almost vitriol. From the humblist cook to the top boss. They are in this Peters New Age plan Woke Cancel Culture named and shamed in a bucket list of grudges. Next up probably who paid a few quid in 1988 to have a fortnight on air. We know anyway but Peter will recite their names and telephone numbers with glee. What does he think he is achieving with this muck raking he claimed he so detested saying it's all in the past. What checkered chess board of tiddlywinks is he playing?

With 2 players of any sense what is the outcome of a game of noughts and crosses?

If mainstream RC was not only real albulm station realistically going, I wonder if I would have any interest in it at all these days

Reply
David Cotter
30/10/2022 10:46:31 am

Posted by David Cotter on October 24, 2022, 6:22 am

'We are now using this absurd, illogical and total fictitious claim by "The BBC" against its very existence as an entity founded upon anything but lies and obfuscation.'

You're on a hiding to nothing with this one.It is fully documented by BBC and others and his been stated in broadcasts by the BBC and others that it's origins date back to 18 October 1922, when the British Broadcasting Company Limited was formed. Any simple research will openly tell you that. Where are the 'lies and obfuscation'? There are none.

I don't except this to pass your censorship, by the way, because it's not what you want to hear, but, if I may say so, that is also a fact.

Posted by Admin on October 24, 2022, 9:37 am, in reply to "BBC"

Board Administrator

Clearly you are a buffoon. The entire point of the post is that the origins of "the BBC" DO NOT date back to 18 October 1922 as you so incorrectly stated. "The BBC" you are listening to or watching dates back to 1927. The corporation and the company are two different entities, and while they share the initials 'BBC', so does the Baptist Bible College in Coventry. But any lawyer who understands company law will tell you that a company is separate from a human being, and it is also separate from a Crown 'corporation'. The fact is that John Reith acted illegally by representing both. That was a breach of his fiduciary duty to shareholders. The company was not wound-up until 1929 - by John Reith as Managing Director - while he was Director General of the other BBC. It was the GPO who bought out the first BBC and 'Wikipedia' has a load of rubbish (as usual) on its page. One BBC did not become another BBC. Most of the time your comments are deleted because they are absurd, this one posted by you is not only absurd, but it also represents the dying anoraks who seem to live in a tiny world of their own in which reality does not exist. Therefore, it was accepted to show how ridiculous your comments are as well as the buffoons you seem to represent.

Since Mervyn Hagger shuts down any discussion that that he is losing and resorts to insults, I'll try a response here:

My point is that he makes a big deal of the1927 not 1922 thing as if he has uncovered this as a shock horror expose which the BBC or whoever has tried to obscure. This is simply not the case. Of course the two BBC's are separate entities in law, nobody denies that.

This is the old 'lineage' argument again, which he used regarding Caroline. He's already been blown out of the water on that one, onto speak, but tries it again as if it's world shattering news, which it isn't.

Reply
Mervyn Hagger
31/10/2022 04:17:44 pm

Cotter you should listen to your mother: you are the idiot she describes. Now go ahead and write that it is not your mother calling you an idiot but me. You also leap to the conclusion that I wrote the reply you cite. I am not your mother and the British Corporation is not the Baptist Bible College of Coventry and neither is it the British Broadcasting Company Limited. All are BBC but not all vacuum cleaners are Hoover, but many call other brands Hoover - but this does make them into a Hoover. You on the other hand are indeed a buffoon.

Reply
Oh look its Fred Bramley
31/10/2022 04:27:34 pm

Well now without the Haggerly so named by DavidLW who was thrown out, brought back and thrown out, now it is Fred Bramley who went on and on and on and on about the Ian Ross novel being Haggerly's only source of information, and now Fred Bramley is being called an idiot and James the big idiot is now saying that the 'Lid off Laser' is a load of rubbish and it off course was written by Paul Rustling the book thief. So who is Garry the adult acting as a child by running streams of make-believe sounds on a board that can't spell - not because of typos but because Garry can't spell. Meanwhile, on the other board Malcolm is still milking the dopes to build his own business.

Hurry up and kick the bucket you miserable lot of old geezers and put yourselves out of misery.

Reply
Mervyn Hagger
31/10/2022 06:41:21 pm

My point is that David Cotter makes a big deal of the fact that he is not his father as if he has uncovered this as a shock horror expose which his mother or whoever has tried to obscure.

This is simply not the case. Of course the two people are separate entities in law, nobody denies that, er, unless David Cotter is not the son of his claimed father.

This is the old 'lineage' argument again, which David Cotter used regarding Caroline. He's already been blown out of the water on that one, onto speak, but tries it again as if it's world shattering news, which it isn't.

(To quote David Cotter).

Reply
David Cotter
31/10/2022 11:21:26 pm

fragileforum.com is still unreachable using that URL. Sort it out, Merv.

Reply
URL Dept
1/11/2022 06:29:21 pm

What has "Merv' got to do with it? We register them. Beside, if it is unreachable how are you able to reach it and why would you want to? Mother says wipe your feet before you come in.

Links are working Dept
1/11/2022 06:30:53 pm

It I type in idiot, or buffoon the link immediately goes to David Cotter. Don't know what you are complaining about.

Domain Redirection Service
2/11/2022 10:15:02 am

It would seem that some redirects were listed https instead of http. This has now been corrected on several redirects not just the one mentioned above. Thank you for drawing this to our attention. We are managing over 100 domains for this client and so it is easy to let errors go unnoticed if more than one redirect goes to the same location.

Atlantisgb!
31/10/2022 09:17:51 pm

bloody hell merve, you do like a good argument but,the so called debates here put others to shame( on the loony side that is!.

Reply
Loony Anoraks Arguments Department
1/11/2022 06:26:18 pm

We do not pick the topics. David Cotter seems to be in charge. So talk to him. What 'Merv' has to do with it we don't know because he seems to think that David Cotter is a mere fool, idiot, buffoon, etc., and he may very well be right. What do you think about this very cerebral matter?

Reply
James McGregor
31/10/2022 10:32:44 pm

Slightly off topic but what a brilliant name for a charity P then S!

Morry sons caught out case

With the help of Pregnant Then Screwed, a charity that seeks to protect, support and promote the rights of pregnant women and mothers, Ms Patterson said she was able to speak to Helen Larkin, who represented herself and won against beauty company Liz Earle after she was sacked while eight months pregnant.

Reply
CHALLENGE FOR ALL ANORAKS
1/11/2022 08:58:54 am

If Ronan O'Rahilly was just a scam artist (as documented by Malcolm Smith), why is his silly Caroline Kennedy story still the explanation for Malcolm Smith's toy called 'Radio Caroline'.

Please anoraks, tell us who was behind the original 'Radio Caroline'.

Paul Rusling was the last person to tell you that Ronan O'Rahilly was the originator with a woman named Oonagh.

Rusling could not think of another explanation.

Rusling had to dismiss or sideline all documentation that conflicted with his interpretation which was the Malcolm Smith version before Malcom Smith started to reveal the dirty secrets covered by the name Ronan O'Rahilly.

So now the official story about Ronan O'Rahilly is tarnished and the only reason for starting 'Radio Caroline' was to play records on a boat. Now it is to play records out of Malcolm Smith's premises.

Garry Stevens is even more weird. He stitches old tapes together and claims that his music tapes represents free radio.

But it was 'Radio London' that the BBC copied for 'Radio One' - not 'Radio Caroline' and Philip Birch said that it succeeded because of paid religion. It was after that when 'Radio Caroline' tried to copy 'Radio London'.

This paid religion was banned on the BBC. Records were not. It was all about freedom of speech, not people sitting on a boat.

So come on anoraks, if 'Caroline Kennedy' and Ronan O'Rahilly are not the true story, what is the true story?

ANSWERS PLEASE

Reply
Who bloody well cares?
3/11/2022 10:07:04 am

Radio Caroline belongs to Peter Moore. End of. O'Rahilly was a con man. So what? Who cares? What matters is that Radio Caroline is on the air in 2023 playing records that we all love and Peter Moore is the man to see if you want to join his team. All this stuff about the past is just boring. If you want music tune to 648, if you want blah, blah, blah as Greta says, then listen to Fred Bramley and company or Garry Stevens who stitches old tapes together and lives in his own little world of make believe. The real Radio Caroline of 2023 has bills to pay so if you want to support it you should go over to our website and make a donation.

Reply
It's Never Open, Dept
3/11/2022 04:50:11 pm

Feedback: Some male with a Scottish accent accompanied by another person was looking at JLRI.CENTER and remarked that it is never open. Second visit apparently. Since it is closed to the public until at least March of 2023, the observations are in order. But the more visits will only result in the same conclusions. If you have questions why not ask them here?

Reply
Curious
4/11/2022 10:27:15 am

What is it?

Reply
David Cotter
4/11/2022 07:49:20 am

How would a casual observer/passer by even be aware that this page exists?

Reply
It's a secret page test site
5/11/2022 11:48:43 am

The aim is to see who comes here and why. You did, so why did you come here and of course, how did you know that it exists since it is a secret?

Reply
David Cotter
7/11/2022 08:18:28 pm

I come here for the entertainment and to call out those whose comments are untrue or unjustly malign others.

Why do you say this page is a secret? It is not.

Joe Biden V's Donald trump
4/11/2022 08:12:02 pm

ROUND 3?
OR IS IT 4?.

Reply
James McGregor
4/11/2022 08:47:56 pm

FFS what has this country come to when this is BBC parenting advice. Like anyone can afford more than a sparkler anyway? Or be demonised for flaunting their wealth?

Xrist, broken BBC keyboard wrist

https://www.bbc.co.uk/tiny-happy-people/bonfire-night-kids-scared-fireworks/z7pyydm

Reply
A|GB WANTS TO KNOW ...
5/11/2022 09:44:32 am

What does he want to know? He wants to know about a book and whether the rubbish spouted on the Garry Stevens and Dave Martin Boards will be included in it.

Well, when the real story began to emerge it was hoped that others would be interested in uncovering the real story, but not so. This brigade of idiots then attacked the messenger, and Malcolm Smith who persists in calling himself by a fake name, is now constantly revealing that Ronan O'Rahilly was a fraud, a fake and a pretty stupid sort of person all told.

But even though Malcom is telling the truth, the daft and dumb anoraks who hear the truth about O'Rahilly, still believe in O'Rahilly.

Then there is this silly idea that free radio means playing records on a boat without interference from anyone except the corrupt little gangsters who own that boat and studio.

It is no wonder that life is just a series of wars devoted to killing and blowing things up or burning things down.

So AGB there is your answer.

You were asked if you wanted to participate and you hurled abuse while Rusling just flat out stole material and twisted it to turn a crook called O'Rahilly into his super-hero.

The story being asked about has nothing to do with old records but about the lies and distortions spread to achieve political and financial goals. But since anoraks are some of the stupidest morons on this Planet, they would not understand.

Does that include you, AGB?

Reply
Time waits for no man
5/11/2022 02:57:14 pm

there is a Barry Ainsworth interview in the new RCSG email just to hammer the knock nails how sad!

Reply
James McGregor
5/11/2022 02:59:47 pm

Adolf did not join the NSDAP he just joind the party to spy on it and then took it over lock stock and catttle truck?

Reply
AgB
5/11/2022 09:11:12 pm

iam not an anorak!
iam a human being unlike some of the morons that post here,there and everywhere,and iam no idiot,as for being asked to participate I was not!
Mervyn you are confused,I'm not Scottg!.
AgB.

Reply
Korrupt Gangster MC Ross
7/11/2022 06:23:30 am

Italy's new Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni put the issue of migration at the centre of her government in her maiden speech to MPs.

"We must stop illegal departures and human trafficking," she said, but stressed that she does not intend "to question the right of asylum for those fleeing wars and persecutions".

In a recent interview she also said responsibility for the migrants on board lies with the country where the ship is registered, otherwise it becomes a "pirate ship".

Reply
AgB
10/11/2022 01:59:50 pm

no merve that does not answer my questions but,the recent update on yesternoir does,and why have a dig at me? the questions I asked were only out of interest in the progress of the book!.
AgB.

Reply
David Cotter
5/11/2022 11:58:18 am

'the corrupt little gangsters who own that boat and studio.'

Gangster: noun:

 a member of an organized group of violent criminals'

That's quite an accusation. I do hope you have actual, documented evidence to back that up before the lawyers come knocking, although you'll probably get away with it as you dare not publish such tripe anywhere where it will be read by more than a handful of people and those who read your musings do so for entertainment purposes.

The rest of your post is unworthy of comment as it is just the same old repetitive rubbish.



Reply
Do you know the answer?
5/11/2022 12:00:13 pm

What is actual date when the story about Caroline Kennedy and Ronan O'Rahilly first appeared in printed form?

Do you know?

Please don't refer to a publication that refers to another publication.

Can you cite a specific publication published on a specific date when the claim was first made that the ship and station were named after Caroline Kennedy as a result of that photograph taken in the White House Oval Office with JFK.?

Reply
David Cotter
6/11/2022 01:04:56 pm

John Blackie's history of British Broadcasting in the 'Transmitting' newsletter seems to be a more authoritative piece than Mervyn's ' the BBC is not 100' rantings.

Reply
Mervyn Hagger
8/11/2022 10:07:48 am

Clearly David Cotter can't read.

If he could he read, he would have read the article I wrote in that same back issue.

I explained how I joined John Blackie at breakfast, and how he explained that he was given very short notice after Covid to put an exhibition together. He was given very limited financial resources and had to use existing exhibition artifacts, and he had extremely limited time. His mission was to show that the Museum was now reopen.

Because David Cotter is a silly little boy who seems dedicated to attacking me personally while defending the Rusling theft and the Smith business, he is not aware that I was one of the exhibition guides with John Blackie at the museum!

I am a paid-up member and active supporter and have been for many years. In fact it was the museum that triggered our own investigation! That event has been covered (with pictures) in earlier editions of the same continuing series of articles that I wrote under my own name.

I am also aware that David Cotter seems to be stalking me personally, and that is very sad because it reveals a truly brainwashed cult member who can't think for himself and who supports the BBC and the total fiction in publication about the start of Radio Caroline.

I have never asked you or any anorak for money, and I do give money and time to the museum and share the costs with two others in our project that entails, rent, buying books, services and investigating the history of broadcasting. It is an expensive undertaking which we have been doing for 50 years.

We have been publishing academic and news features as well as contributing the continuing series for 'Transmitting'.

We are also in the process of preparing the first in a series of books that will totally rewrite British and American radio history as it has been traditionally presented to prop-up the BBC.

You infer that what I have written about the BBC is untrue. But the only way you can do that is if you can't count. The British Broadcasting Corporation is 95 years old, not 100 years old.

The exhibition was about the entity referred to as 'BBC', and not the British Broadcasting Corporation. For his guide John referred to a new book about 'The BBC' which was on sale at the Museum, which I bought to support the Museum and to add to our own library. Have you read that book?

'The BBC' is what my article was about.

In fact, John Blackie introduced me to a great publication I had not see before about the 200 plus shareholders of the original BBC cartel; the trade-mark dispute involving the two BBC operations, and the fact that Reith closed down the original BBC in 1929 - not 1927 - and that in doing so, Reith may have been in violation of British company laws in wearing two hats at once and therefore selling out the shareholders of the original cartel - to the GPO (Post Office), not to the second BBC.

But you don't know any of this do you?

You are propping-up an adult child fantasy fixation about Caroline Kennedy, that was advanced by Ronan O'Rahilly as a means of explaining who 'Caroline' was.

It was fiction and ROR did not invent it.

We (our group) now know the origins of the fiction that seems to have first emerged around March of 1965. No one seems to have ever spouted the lie about Caroline Kennedy before then, and to this day no anorak seems to be able to explain how 'Radio Caroline' got its name, or why.

Look above and see my previous post about this issue. You seem to be unable to answer my previous post on this site about O'Rahilly and Caroline Kennedy.

Instead you support the idiot Rusling who self-publishes a vanity book after STEALING material from our group and then twisting it to prop-up Malcolm Smith's little business which Smith gets stooges like you to pay for.

David Cotter, you represent everything that is pathetically stupid about anoraks and their silly belief that if they can play old records on a boat, that they are contributing some great value to humanity which they call 'free radio'.

I have one last question to ask you David: Are you brain-injured?

I mean, do you have a medical condition restricting your critical thinking process, or are you just another dumb and stupid anorak stealing from other people?

Your call.

Then tell us all what YOU have contributed to the betterment of enlightened education benefitting humanity.

We are waiting.

Reply
David Cotter's Mum's Uncle via James McGregor
8/11/2022 11:55:37 am

Oi David Cotter - it don't publish no "newsletter' it publishes a magazine in print and digital formats. Wot u readin'? Someone told you about it but u didn't actually read it? That figures. By the way, the world really isn't flat, it's u that lives in one.

Reply
David's Co-Worker
8/11/2022 03:52:30 pm

Sorry David, I guess you annoyed them so much that they took time to contact me and find out who you are. They now have your picture and a lot more. You are out of your depth. Stick to your local community work because I get the impression that if you keep up bothering them they will swat you in good Irish fashion. I don't want to identify myself in public but you know who I am.

Reply
Don't care in the community
10/11/2022 09:53:21 am

Interesting! Who are "they"? Tell us more about this Cotter bloke.

David Cotter Response to your question about Caroline
9/11/2022 10:31:17 pm

Oh, I forgot, you don't know who financed the Caroline ship, so why should I tell you. I just want to know why you think that the BBC is not 100 years old?

Reply
James McGregor
6/11/2022 04:16:05 pm

I don't konw waht to say. I feel like a ship lost ast sea

Reply
Radio Caroline bible
8/11/2022 06:32:04 pm

SOLD OUT,
reprint in 2023.

Reply
David Cotter's Northside Co-worker
9/11/2022 10:28:09 pm

I know you became a shared big fish in very small bowl David, but why don't you team up with Agb and write a revised text for Paul Rusling now that it is obvious he is stuck in a rut of misinformation? You have a lot to say about local history but your talents seem to stop at academic research into the origins of the ship Caroline. You are getting out of your depth and exposing yourself to ridicule and this could bounce back on your friends. Either write a correction for Rusling and help him pay for his reprint, or better still just keep quiet. I don't want the people you are attacking to start investigating me.

Reply
Comparison review
11/11/2022 04:53:50 pm

Not as soft and strong or useful as toilet paper. That sells out and constantly gets reprinted.

Reply
Life raft laughs
9/11/2022 03:15:56 pm

Yes James, We note your best friend Garry has banned you yet again.
Never mind their is always Dave. Oh no you can't go their either to praise Moore

Poor James - confronting his mortal failings of not even being accepted as an arse licker and a crawler

How sad - poor James the pooh

Reply
David Cotter
9/11/2022 11:12:06 pm

To Mervyn Hagger et al:

I am not stalking anyone. As someone who has an interest in broadcasting I was made aware of the museum and read the current and back issues on the website. I should like to visit it some day.

Perhaps we all make too much of the 'is it 100 years' thing. I don't suppose it really matters.

I don't think I've ever said that I support the 'Caroline Kennedy' theory and neither do I think that the Caroline team feel that they are 'contributing to humanity'. I cannot find any reference to that or similar being an objective of theirs.

As for 'David's Co-Worker', I have no idea who you are or what you are talking about.

I think it's time to bid you all a fond farewell. This is all too silly.

Reply
Mervyn Hagger
11/11/2022 08:01:30 am

I read your co-worker's comments and it seems that you are causing grief to some of your friends. It you had an interest in broadcasting you would enter into a serious academic discussion concerning issues and not just posting smears. If you disagree with a point based upon evidence you SHOULD post your evidence relating to the specific point you are disagree with, but that is not what you do.

Reply
Who am I?
11/11/2022 08:22:07 am

James McGregor Brand Reminder2/2/2020 08:09:50 pm
Clearly this sick idiot is out to force Mike to impose a password system without which it will be impossible to continue any form of conversation on this forum. The only other alternative will be for Mike to screen all posts before they appear.

Reply
David's Co-Worker
11/11/2022 04:51:43 pm

You know who I am, and I know that you made local people aware of your assistance in commemorating local history. But why you now find it necessary to support someone who is engaged in a vanity project spreading more false information about people in our local area, while at the same time starting an argument with someone else who is conducting an investigation, I don't know. All I am saying is that if you keep needling don't be surprised if you personally end up in the spotlight. Just keep me out of your performance. You are correct in one respect: this is silly.

Reply
David Cotter
12/11/2022 10:44:18 pm

Just a final word to you, if I may.

I genuinely do not know who you are. I have no co-workers as I do not work either in a paid nor voluntary capacity. I have done nothing to 'assist in commemorating local history' and do not understand your references to that, 'community work' or 'Irish'. I have no connections there or with anyone Irish and have never had any active involvement in broadcasting myself. I plucked the name 'David Cotter' out of thin air to preserve my anonymity as you and others do, although I have not posted under any other name. I know of noone who is actually named David Cotter.

I hope that this will correct any confusion as to mistaken identities and prevent any misapprehensions. If you perceive this post to be a somewhat over zealous denial, I am merely concerned that there is an actual, living David Cotter somewhere on this earth that you deduce is myself, which is not the case.

In any event, I shall keep my own counsel henceforth!

Reply
Mervyn Hagger
14/11/2022 09:02:41 am

So "David Cotter" is now admitting that he has stolen someone else's identity and is worried that he is going to become the target of an investigation. Well, that is interesting.

Perhaps the person claiming to be "David Cotter" but says that he isn't (but maybe he really is David Cotter?), can stick to the issue and tell us all about the origins of Radio Caroline?

The reason I quit 'Wikipedia' years ago is because of people like David Cotter (whoever he is), who kept reposting rubbish that Ronan O'Rahilly created Radio Caroline and named it and a ship after a 6 years old girl called Caroline Kennedy.

So come on 'David Cotter', tell us the truth about he origins of Radio Caroline, even though you can't tell us the truth about who you are on this Forum.

Reply
Blog Frankenstein
15/11/2022 06:28:48 pm

Paul Rusling is not banned from this group; he is a member of this group and has posted here in the past.
Unfortunately, Paul is not very tech savvy and seems unable to understand the concept of remembering a username and password. We have held his hand through the process a couple of times in the past.

LOL Paul will really like being told he is not very tech savvy?

How long before Merve notices this divorce fom admiration?

Reply
David Cotter
15/11/2022 09:52:22 pm

It seems that further clarification is required for those who choose not to read and understand what I have written.

I repeat that my pseudonym was my own invention and not a 'stolen identity', much the same as, presumably, 'John England' and 'Caroline Brooks'' were not stolen by yourself and your associate from real persons bearing those names. I would not wish that an individual unconnected to this 'discussion' who is actually named David Cotter become subject to some kind of misguided and unjustified investigation by yourself or any other party.

I shall not rise to any further baiting, so a response is not necessary and future comments here will not be responded to.

Reply
David Cotter's Mum
18/11/2022 08:06:16 pm

Oh thank goodness for that.

Mervyn Hagger
16/11/2022 09:28:58 am

For all those sick and twisted, mind damaged anoraks (like David Cotter who claims that he is really someone else), my attempt to rectify upon discovery the real story about 'Radio Caroline' is documented, if you know where to find it, in the archived editions of Wikipedia.

When I told Garry Stevens' idiots that I was taking note of their stupid attacks on me, and that I may republish them, a howl went up from these fools (like Agb and Scottg and all the rest), and they got very angry at the possibility that I might repost their own words to let the world see - in context - how childishly foolish these twerps really are.

Welcome to the cesspool of twerps David Cotter (identified as the one posting here and on anorak related issues sites. I add this disclaimer in case the real David Cotter in Ireland who is interested in local history, has nothing to do with the person posting here as 'David Cotter'.)

Meantime there is absolutely no doubt who I am, and that years ago when I adopted the 'John England' pen name in another country for political and commercial reasons, as soon as the need for a pen name went away I identified myself as the user of that pen name.

The reason I have a total disdain for anoraks is that they lie, they cheat, they steal and they represent the worst aspects of humanity. The people behind the original offshore stations were primarily successful business people who were playing both sides against the middle and had something to hide.

Anoraks merely hide in their own bedrooms with keyboards, and for some strange reason they think that playing old records on a boat, or even pretending to be on a boat, has something to do with advancing human civilization - when in reality it just identifies them as silly people with very little in common with reality.

No doubt 'David Cotter' (on this board) feels right at home with his anorak mates.

Reply
Mervyn Hagger
17/11/2022 06:28:54 pm

Back in 2005 - 2009 I tried to get others to help uncover the real and very complex story behind the creation of Radio Caroline. Back then I tried to sort out the RC story and I began several other related Wikipedia pages.

Instead of help, the really daft group called anoraks turned on me and kept reversing all corrected pages and attacking all new pages to support the really pathetic and pedophile themed interest in Caroline Kennedy that was shown by Ronan O'Rahilly.

Malcom Smith has just about destroyed any credibility in anything spouted by Ronan O'Rahilly, although he has not as yet called him out as a pedophile. However, O'Rahilly had plenty of that ilk in the radio business to keep him company, if he wanted that kind of company.

What the idiot thief named Paul Rusling never knew - because I never revealed this gigantic piece of the puzzle to him - although he did know about its existence - but not its relevance - was that I had uncovered a story on his own doorstep, but Rusling was so fixated on his claim to knowledge of Radio 270, that he never explored it. He was incapable. All Rusling ever knew was how to steal from me and how to glorify a disreputable twerp such as Ronan O'Rahilly, that even Malcom Smith has been attacking with joy.

But Malcom is not foolish person. He is a hardworking guy who has his own dream business in mind, I have no problem with that, but Malcolm dare not get even remotely close to me for fear of being attacked by the anoraks. He needs them to help pay his business bills.

However, we are now very close to laying out the big picture - including the story under Rusling's nose and explaining how it fits with the rest of the picture. The person everyone should have taken apart was Jocelyn Stevens. He never bought 'The Queen' as such, but he was a co-director with John Sheffield years before the advent of Radio Caroline. Stevens employed Ian Ross as a dogsbody.
If the anoraks had looked, they would have discovered something really weird about 'The Queen' magazine that first tied it to Philip Solomon - as late as 1966 - when Solomon moved in, after Crawford had moved out.

Our book?

It now has a working title for a manuscript in progress.

It is 'YesterWars' and it will go back in time to the middle of the Nineteenth Century and then continue within a biographical format to concentrate upon the people who led to the creation of Radio Caroline.

If you are an annoying anorak please tune to 648 and spend your time telling Malcolm how to run his stations. It will occupy your time, although unless you come with money, Malcolm will ignore you.

Reply
Mervyn Hagger
18/11/2022 08:12:47 pm

Two of our sites developed a glitch when a California company bought an Irish company and user names and passwords became confused when the email address was cancelled due to inactivity. Anyway, problems seem to have now been fixed at long last and so if you have been asking what is (or is not) going on? Now you know.

Reply
AgB
19/11/2022 09:56:33 pm

thanks for the answer merve,
even though my post didn't appear on your members5 place.
AgB.

Reply
Mervyn Hagger
20/11/2022 08:57:34 pm

AgB = Generally speaking that Board is now reserved for genuine contributions about content.

I know that you think I blast everyone over everything but that is not true at all. How I wish that I could get a James to genuinely point out even a typo - which I know appear. When I spot them I do my best to correct them asap.

But, AgB, how about getting down to brass tacks and tacking the fraudulent bilge that Rusling and others are peddling?

This story about Jimmy Ross being Ian Ross' father who entertained ROR and gave him a suitcase of money to buy a ship named after Caroline Kennedy has been blown to smithereens. Yet Malcom Smith is still trading on ROR as if ROR ever told the truth instead of being a 95% liar (I will give him 5% - but even that is being generous.)

Anyway, how about engaging in serious discussion about very specific points, and I do mean very specific points relating to Radio Caroline's start-up in 1964?

We would all welcome it - instead of baby talk from James McGregor who is currently drooling over toasters.

ANORAK CHALLENGE
21/11/2022 10:08:04 am

For all anoraks. See http://www.allaboutradiocaroline.co.uk/

Reply

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.


Leave a Reply.

    Radio Now & Then

    Each article can receive your replies (comments). We will not tolerate bad language, trolls, or unprovoked personal attacks. Unlike other places however you are allowed to express your personal opinions however much they may differ with the original article, as long as they are constructive.

    Archives

    June 2025
    May 2025
    April 2025
    March 2025
    February 2025
    December 2024
    November 2024
    October 2024
    September 2024
    August 2024
    July 2024
    June 2024
    May 2024
    April 2024
    March 2024
    February 2024
    January 2024
    December 2023
    November 2023
    August 2023
    July 2023
    June 2023
    May 2023
    April 2023
    March 2023
    February 2023
    January 2023
    December 2022
    November 2022
    October 2022
    September 2022
    August 2022
    July 2022
    June 2022
    May 2022
    April 2022
    March 2022
    February 2022
    January 2022
    December 2021
    November 2021
    October 2021
    September 2021
    August 2021
    July 2021
    June 2021
    May 2021
    April 2021
    March 2021
    February 2021
    January 2021
    December 2020
    November 2020
    October 2020
    September 2020
    August 2020
    July 2020
    June 2020
    May 2020
    April 2020
    March 2020
    February 2020
    January 2020
    December 2019
    November 2019
    October 2019
    September 2019
    August 2019
    July 2019

    Categories

    All

    RSS Feed

Powered by Create your own unique website with customizable templates.