Scotland's Woke Utopia In Context.

8/4/2024

OK I admit it, I am a walking hate crime. I love normality. I crave for free speech without condition. I want to debate opposing views. I want to support the fight for recognition if I agree, or have the right to voice my opinion if I disagree. I want to question all science that personally seems wrong to me. I love humanity and despise those who seek to divide. I want to hold those to account without fear of repercussions, simply because we disagree. Therefore I cannot live in Scotland. The resistance to totalitarian evil begins with comedy, it's got to be better than war.

38 Comments

From Scotland with Haggerly (one of the names assigned to me by detractors.)

9/4/2024 09:25:33 am

Mike, ignore my first post, I noticed that MSN was doing 'auto-correct' on text that created problems where none existed. So here is the revised and un-corrected version:

-----------------------------------------

The problem with comedy, and there is a BIG problem with comedy, is that the Powers-that-Be, namely those who have the ability to enact legislation, always provide outlets for dissent. The USSR was known for its satire - mocking the Soviet system. BBC-TV is awash with it and has been for decades: 'Yes Minister'; 'Monty Python', the list is enormous.

The problem is with the communications departments of UK universities.

How on earth did that absurd creature of a young female Tory MP, stand-up in the House of Commons with support from a not-so-young female Labour MP, and create momentum for Malcolm Smith to get a government license - on the basis that he represented some sort of national heritage with his 'Radio Caroline?'

Why didn't the Lockerbie trial prosecute Bollier of RNI, after all Paul Harris fingered him as a key player in that terrorist disaster?

Then there is the Post Office Scandal, which like Lockerbie and RNI has its roots in 1660 and the creation of the Post Office on behalf of the Crown. Who is the Head of the Crown today? King Charles III.

But if we ask what happened to Charles I, and how did Chales II get established to allow for Charles III to come along, we are met with silence.

I recently visited a village in Scotland called Alyth.

Most people have never heard of it.

But Alyth is famous for one thing: it is where Scotland as a country ceased to exist because it was folded into a republic comprised of England, Scotland and Ireland.

Forget 1066. Forget Magna Carta of 1215, in fact you can forget everything you know because what you know about your own country, about the Post Office, about the MOA of 1967, and the jamming of RNI, is all based upon your own false understanding of the past.

To put it in basic terms, recall that Bee Gees song 'Words' and then listen to the next BBC news bulletin talking about 'international law', 'war crimes' etc., and ask: where do I find the World Government legislature that enacts world laws and where is its police force that enforces their compliance?

There is NO such thing as 'international law' or 'crimes against humanity'.

What does exist, and what has always existed is a mantra, is: "Might Make RIght," or do what I tell you to do or I will blow your silly head off with my gun.

Now make a joke about that.

George Carlin tried with his humour about "Saving the Planet", and a fat lot of good that did.

Now we have Woke where the meaning of words is subjective at all times.

Have you read George Orwell's novel '1984' - it wasn't about the Past, it was about now. It was about Woke and its end result, which right now, is still in the future, but time is running out.

Laugh while you can.

That Orweilian dystopia is right around the corner.

-------------------------------------------------------

Now have a look at this: http://foundthreads.com/03.html

It was penned in 2015, the year that I went to make that Lecture about 'Radio Caroline' at Burntisland, Scotland. It was the moment that everything that I thought I knew got wiped out, and it led to the creation of this present round of research now drawing to its finality with a book manuscript!

Radio Caroline North Web Shop

9/4/2024 05:26:53 pm

Great. More produce

Admin (Mike Wilson)

10/4/2024 10:18:02 pm

If you cant see the bigger picture and only come here to try and score some petty points against Mervyn then you don't belong here.Go back to your grandmothers basement and type some stupid messages to another site. You know who you are!

Ouch!

10/4/2024 11:01:41 pm

I forgot that there is only one true light, and it shines forth over a dark world from Falkirk. Pity Hagger can't fight his own battles and has to have a carer to sheild him from criticism.

Admin - Mike W

12/4/2024 07:44:19 pm

Oh your so brave you sad little troll. Mervyn doesn't need my protection whereas you have to hide behind a made up name. Whilst you revel in your own self importance the wheels will one day come off of the fake Radio Caroline narrative.

Having seen much of the evidence (and not just me, there are others in receipt of the details) the Ronan myth along with the fake story line will make a laughing stock of the gullible (ie YOU).

I agree!

11/4/2024 02:29:23 pm

Absolutely, Mike!

It's a pity that these people don't have something better to do than nitpicking. Why don't they address the real issues? Presumably they're happy to let themselves be deluded until they fhinally get woken up. They should listen to Mervyn and yourself instead of sleepwalking into the abyss while they play with their bogus toy town radio station and their rusting hulk.

Talking of gullibility......

12/4/2024 11:01:54 pm

You do realise that the comments here supporting Mervyn and yourself AND those in opposition are all made by the same person, don't you?

Admin (Or Am I)

13/4/2024 08:41:03 pm

"You do realise that the comments here supporting Mervyn and yourself AND those in opposition are all made by the same person, don't you?"

Oh please do enlighten us, names for starters? Or even better take your well worn IP address back to Garry Borad and bore them to death instead. Oh and there are work a round's for VPN's but you wont find that on the googly search joke.

Ronan's Timeline

11/4/2024 10:11:50 am

Using Ronan's statements about himself, and the official records documenting his own movements and those of his original two companions: Chris Moore and Ian Ross, the window of his movements in relation to the Radio Caroline timeline, is very short and narrow.

Ronan says on camera about himself that he first arrived in London during 1961. He also says in print that he had about £100 in his pocket at that time. In other words he had to get a job.

He got a job doing errand work for Peter Rachman who owned 'The Scene' and other clubs Ronan worked at. Then Rachman died in December 1962 and the clubs were taken over by Raymond Nash. This was the hang-out of street gangs and early drug pushers to teens. Ronan was accused of being a stooge for the drug pushers. He was also accused of being a stooge for the people behind Radio Caroline.

Only arriving in London with little money in 1961, Ronan's world was as a lap dog for the likes of the Kray Twins and Mandy Rice-Davies, later managed by Kitty Black's husband.

That is the same world that Chris Moore found himself working in as a DJ for one of the clubs. Ronan and Chris knew each other because they moved in the same circles of street drugs pushed to teens at these clubs.

When Rachman died in December 1962, Ronan went in search of a new money source and he met Allan Crawford. The connection was Crawford and pop music recordings, and his failed Isle of Wight attempt to start a radio station.

While Ronan had fled his father's business, his dad needed money to buy his own export ship (he was leasing one), and Ronan introduced Crawford to his father. At the same time Crawford had become part of something much bigger - the plans of Charles Orr Stanley.

Where the Ray Clark story really goes off the rails after 1990, is in buying into the Ian Ross novel as though it was fact. So Clark uses the fake Ross timeline and links Ronan with Moore to Ross.

But that never happened.

Ross seems to have been forced into taking a job with Jocelyn Stevens' company and that is where and how Ross met Moore and Ronan O'Rahilly.

Just look at that first Granada TV World in Action video and notice the silent Ross sitting off in a corner and not part of the Stevens-Ronan-Moore conversation.

Ross got the job via his dad who sold dry-cleaning franchises and also became a director of Jensen Cars after Norcros took it over. Ross got one of those cars and crashed it and himself into hospital for a year and then into a court of law at Derby.

So Ian's dad got him a job with Jocelyn who was related to John Sheffileld who began a cluster of Norcros companies, one of which Stevens was a director.

Norcos failed with Jensen and let it go, but getting Ian a job with Stevens got his dad off the hook with the court, because Ian's dad was named in the court case in which his stupid teenage son smashed up a Jensen car and his own foot.

Ian's half-brother lived and worked on King's Road and wanted nothing to do with him.

So after 1964, Moore wandered off on his own, and so did Ian by marrying into British aristocracy and money. Later still he reinvented himself in 1990 with his novel and BBC-TV show.

Meanwhile, Ronan's father prospered while his son become more and more useless as time went on by claiming to be the head of this that and the other fantasy. If the Mi Amigo had not been pulled off the scrap heap by a Dutchman, and then others wanted Ronan as a make-believe figurehead, none of the 2024 mythology promoted now by Malcolm Smith would be possible.

In short, Ronan O'Rahilly was in cloud cuckoo-land for years before biology took over and subjected him to a terrible disease. For anoraks to worship this fool - and that is what he was - makes them images of his self-induced stages of dementia.

Exhibit 'A' link

14/4/2024 08:28:56 pm

https://www.offshoreradio.co.uk/rayclar7.jpg

Fack Checker

15/4/2024 11:54:32 am

Already proven to be fake elsewhere, you need to keep up!!

Exhibit 'A'

15/4/2024 01:28:23 pm

Ah, I didn't know that. Can you elaborate, please, perhaps with a link? I know Mervyn has said 'probably' fake, but I haven't seen any reasoning behind that.

Take a closer look INSIDE Ray Clark's new book

15/4/2024 02:32:44 pm

He has a whole strip of these so-called greetings telegrams which do not match GPO documents, and which all seem to be identical as if one person faked them all. But undoing all of Ray Clark's thesis is that it ALL rests on the 1990 invention of Ian Ross about a car trip to see 'Jimmy' who did not exist. Ian even gets the name of the coffee shop wrong. It was KENCO and not Kenya. Ian's step-brother was on King's Road, but Ian was not and his step-brother wanted nothing to do with this 17-18 year old kid who stole a Jensen, crashed into a bus, almost lost his foot and ended up in court. His REAL dad made him get a job with Jocelyn Stevens so that Ian could pay his court fine. Now find any of that in Ray Clark's work of fiction.

Chris Edwards

15/4/2024 05:34:20 pm

The Greetings telegram is not a fake ' I've seen the original and also several others sent at the same time, all among Ronan's effects. Another is from Allan Crawford, and one from Michael Parkin.

Former Telegram Office Worker!

16/4/2024 07:57:26 pm

The image is of this telegram is one that would have been delivered to the recipient. The sender does not have that version, he would have hand written his message and handed that in at a Post Office, paid by the letter (they counted the letters and affixed stamps for the amount due). The strips were eventually printed out and gummed to a telegram sheet by the receiving Post Office.

The fact that Ronan had these telegrams in his possession begs one simple question. After he had sent them did he visit each person and ask for the final copy back? That he had a number in his possession adds to the case that they were forgeries. How on earth did he get them all back?

Now do some research or go to the Post Office Museum in London and ask for some examples. In my teens I worked in a telegram office, it was a really good job, and ironically I had Caroline playing on my transistor radio using a large metal radiator to boost the signal. Small world eh?

Chris Edwards

16/4/2024 08:59:22 pm

The Allan Crawford telegram was sent to Ronan, and the Michael Parkin one was sent to the Caroline press launch, so clearly Ronan would have had these. I have seen another from someone called Carmen, again sent to Ronan. They are date stamped on the back of 28 March 1964. Why would anyone want to fake them.

Why would anyone want to fake them

17/4/2024 07:19:41 pm

Not all telegrams may be fake but the one in the image that started this off clearly is! It's on the wrong paper and a whole load of information that would include codes for sending and receiving offices is missing from the top or the bottom depending on where the individual handling the telegram before handing them to the delivery person chose to put them. Sorry Chris but that one and any done the same way are almost certainly fake. Why would Ronan fake anything? Oh come on please the man was a devious so and so, why wouldn't he? When he smelt free money everything was in play

Think about it

18/4/2024 11:12:20 am

Telegrams were taken out of service in 1982. In the overall scheme of things, those in question are of little consequence, so why would anyone go to the trouble, expense and difficulty in making period replicas of the greetings telegrams, making the paper strips and replicating the typeface used in the text. It doesn't make any sense.

Mervyn Hagger book review of Ray Clark's 2024 work of fiction

13/4/2024 04:08:00 pm

Back in 2014 I bought Ray Clarks' first attempt at spinning his version of the Radio Caroline Story.

Then I bought his updated edition.

Now in 2024 (from Amazon), I have bought his most recent version that he published this year.

Ray Clark as an author appears t have no shame, no respect for honesty in reporting, and no desire to tell the real story of Radio Caroline. Instead, Ray Clark is working with a tiny (by comparison with the 1964 station), British government licensed station calling itself 'Radio Caroline'. But this transmission runt is forbidden from broadcasting political messages, and forbidden to sell time to religious groups. Hence it is not a 'free radio station'. It is a UK government licensed station that is falsely calling itself 'Radio Caroline'. Ray Clark is one of its broadcasting 'staff'.

In 2014, I stumbled across a biography of Charles Orr Stanley who was the real promoter of Radio Caroline, but his biography only contained one mysterious reference in one paragraph on one page of that book. But it contradicted everything I thought I knew about the start of Radio Caroline.

Years earlier I had written the story of 'Radio Caroline' - as I knew it then - only to discover that I had been misled and the real story had not been published. In 2015 I began an expensive quest in both time and money, along with two associates - one of who is an international university professor whose background includes published academic works about broadcast communications - including Radio Caroline.

It is now 2024, and we (our 'trio') have been publishing online, aspects of our researched findings into the true history of Radio Caroline. What Ray Clark has now published in 2024 in not just a continuation of LIES, but an attempt to assimilate some of the material that has been uncovered since 2015. However, his method is to hammer square pegs into round holes in order to promote the bogus UK government licensed 'toy' station - without telling the truth about the origins of the real Radio Caroline in 1964!

Yet Ray Clark keeps telling everyone that he is telling the real story - instead of admitting that he is fraudulently publishing a FAKE story. Ray Clark is well aware of who I am and his little army of followers have called me every kind of nasty name they can think of, because they want me to shut up, and they wish that we (as a trio), would shut up and go away.

That is not going to happen.

Instead, we will be publishing in sequence, a new series of books that include the true story of Radio Caroline, and they will be in addition to the complimentary series of monographs and academic articles we have already published.

Mervyn Hagger = I bought his book!

13/4/2024 06:14:44 pm

Before launching a total blitz on RAY CLARK as nothing more than Malcolm Smith's puppet of puke, having succeeded PAUL RUSLING who seems to have slunk away into the darkness where liars all belong, I bought the latest book by Ray Clark.

Ray Clark does not admit having bought into the lies and deception, instead, he is now trying reshape his lies to fit his bigger lies. So I bought his book and I have modified by earlier review of his first book. After all, Ray Clark knows that he is lying. He knows that what his is publishing is untrue. He cannot claim that it is an honest mistake.

Ray Clark is being totally dishonest and he wants you to pay him money for his lies. That is an indisputable fact. He knows who I am. He knows about the research we have undertaken. But he has chosen to hitch his story to Ian Ross.

After all, once the 60 Years of Radio Caroline is shown to be a lie, then Malcolm Smith has a BIG problem trying to sell a heritage that he and Rusling and Clark have made up!

But these nasty pieces of deception who are leaving in their wake so much deceit once they all kick the bucket and die - as they will - need to be countered with the real story, the real truth - NOW!

Come on anoraks, miss the point completely and tell me I mistypeddddddd something.

Oh dear!

18/4/2024 09:07:17 am

Your so called book review on Amazon has been deleted.

You're welcome!

Fred Bramley Pirate Radio Book Expert

15/4/2024 12:39:38 pm

Yesterday on the Garry Board I posted a note to show everyone I was still alive. The reason I have not attacked Hagger lately for repeating the Ian Ross novel, is because Ray Clark has now published his third book based upon Ian Ross' novel, while Hagger continues to attack Ian Ross' novel.

Ray Clark has created a bit of a problem for me because I posted so many attacks on Hagger for believing what Ian Ross wrote, but while Hagger denies this, Ray Clark is openly selling his new book based upon Ian Ross' novel.

It's a bit of a problem for those like me who want to attack Hagger when friends of mine like Ray Clark do the very thing I am accusing Hagger of doing (which Hagger denies), while Ray Clark makes no secret of the fact that his whole book is based upon Ian Ross' 1990 novel.

We need a new plan of action to attack Hagger with because if he publishes his own book, all of the anoraks are going to look very silly.

Help me out guys.

WHY RAY CLARK IS A FRAUD

16/4/2024 10:49:03 pm

1. The so-called Greetings telegraph is a duplication of one basic design that does not represent any GPO document. One basic document was used over and over again and none the reproductions were ever sent as telegrams by the GPO.
2. Everything Ray Clark has written depends upon what even Fred Bramley calls a 1990 work of fiction by Ian Ross.
3. Ray Clark does not deal with real evidence already available, but if the 1990 fake story is taken away, Ray Clark is revealed as a bigger fraud than Paul Rusling.
4. The only person who has anything to gain from Ray Clark's lies is Malcolm Smith because his new station calling itself Radio Caroline has absolutely no connection to the original 1964 station.

With respect......

18/4/2024 08:33:35 am

You have not examined the original documents. You do not know the circumstances under which they have come to light. You have not interviewed or had any dialogue with the author or parties involved. Therefore, you are not in a position to pass judgement on their authenticity based merely on images in a book.

Given your reputation and attacks upon him, I doubt whether Ray would wish to discuss the matter with you, but his contact details are readily available and in my experience he is an approachable, honest and respectable individual. To suggest that he has gone to the trouble of faking evidence is frankly, laughable and probably actionable.

Chris Edwards

18/4/2024 08:03:35 pm

It's reassuring that some have done a bit of research, and find examples of the 1964 telegram design, rather than dismissing them out of hand as fake, as assumedly they didn't fit with "everything fake". The originals of the telegrams were among the effects of the late Ronan O'Rahilly, and yes I have inspected them.
And on the subject of fake, perhaps someone could explain how Jimmy Ross who doesn't exist according - and only invented in 1990, to an so called forensic investigation. Jimmy Ross, is named in Sunday Telegraph on12 December 1965.

The Telegram

17/4/2024 07:54:53 am

Whoever it was who wrote about the strip of greeting telegrams that suddenly (miraculously) appeared after all these years on page 140 of Ray Clark's new book, has unmasked Ray Clark as a total fraud because the Senders (supposedly 3 of them), would not be the Recipients.

Only the recipients would receive the actual telegrams. So how did Ray Clark manage to get these 3 images - preserved after all these years - from 3 separate people? Well, actually two people and a whole gang of people according to image number two.

Then there is the artwork of the supposed telegram itself. This was not a GPO product and only the GPO could send telegrams. The faked artwork is identical in all three images. Nowhere does a GPO code appear. The wording is completely fake.

But the clincher is the second image. Who was it sent to? It simply says 'Kensington'. But look at the hodge-podge collection of names. All of these people were hanging out at an unidentified address in 'Kensington'? How did the GPO deliver this message without an address, and who at that address has kept this telegram after all these years on behalf of everyone else?

Then there is the blooper in which Ray Clark says that the name of one of these people is 'Jose' - and 'Jose' is Jocelyn Stevens. OEM knows who 'Jose' is, but Ray Clark does not?

Look at the first 'telegram' image and the second strip of text. It claims to be addressed to "Mr Ross" at "Reynardswood in Hindhead". Now look at the second 'telegram' image. The address of the Sender is shown instead of the Recipient who is supposed to be a sort of commune in 'Kensington'? The address is secret but the GPO like Santa Claus knows where to find everyone.

This strip of telegrams is so silly, so absurd and so obviously fake that they seem to say that Ray Clark is working for someone (Malcolm Smith?) to busily fake evidence to support his mythical claim of a 60 years anniversary.

If Ray Clark is engaged in such a fraudulent venture with Malcolm Smith, then he needs to be stopped because he is part of a plan to swindle money from the public. That is a crime under the laws of England which is where Ray Clark is operating.

Paul Rusling was an honest idiot. Ray Clark seems to be a devious CROOK.

I beg to differ link

18/4/2024 08:10:54 am

"This was not a GPO product"

Yes it was. There are other contemporary examples, such as this:

http://www.marilynpowell.co.uk/Resources/avonstelegram.jpeg

Why not ask Ray yourself for an explanation? His contact details are readily available and in my experience he is an approachable, honest and respectable individual. He may, of course, choose not to enter into a dialogue with someone who has a vendetta against him without foundation.

Not begging but differing

18/4/2024 06:06:11 pm

1. This is NOT a GPO product.
2. This is NOT a GPO telegram
3. Ray Clark has PROVEN HIMSELF to be a crook supporting a fraud.
4. We have the FACTS BUT YOU HAVE STATEMENTS.

Ray Clark's entire fiction is based upon Ian Ross' 1990 novel

More than this, we now have a bombshell coming up to show that the dirty, dark secret covered up by the fiction is abusive sex of the Jimmy Saville kind.

FAKED FACTS

18/4/2024 09:34:46 pm

There are at least 2 other examples of this artwork being used to send genuine greetings telegrams that can be found online, and the wording is standard, but where the Ray Clark strip comes apart as a fake, is in the content shown on the artwork.

The first RC example is to 'Mr Ross' at Hindhead. It does not say 'Jimmy' or even Charles. This points directly at Ian Cowper Ross and it was ICR who invented the fake story about Ronan O'Rahilly in 1990. This detailed story of a journey never appeared anywhere until 1990. More than that, Charles Edward Ross was never called 'Jimmy' and he was NOT involved with the financing of Radio Caroline. He got his son (Ian) a job with Jocelyn Stevens via John Sheffield - because Stevens owned shares in a Norcros company. Ian as a late teen needed a job to pay his court fine due to reckless driving and years earlier Jocelyn Stevens was known for the same thing.

Having already researched and documented the life of Ronan O'Rahilly, Stephen Moore (Chris) and ICR, it can be stated dogmatically that none of them has anything to do with the financial start of Radio Caroline.

The second Clark telegram is addressed to the convenience address on Regent Street which was a mail drop. Clark is even confused as to who the people are.

As for the 3rd Clark telegram, this is a joke in itself and it contradicts even the fake narrative delivered by Crawford who pretended that he did not know anything about Caroline. In fact it was part of Project Atlanta Limited financing.

The real story yet to come in print will not only reveal Ronan O'Rahilly's work for organized crime after he arrived in London during 1961, but it will also strip back the curtain and reveal the 'Jimmy Saville' nature of what was going on and why the serious business side threw in the towel.

Radio Caroline was the organized crime station.

Ray Clark dumps the facts to sell Malcolm Smith's big lie.

Begging to differ again link

20/4/2024 09:06:32 am

" This is NOT a GPO product.
2. This is NOT a GPO telegram"

"The so-called Greetings telegraph is a duplication of one basic design that does not represent any GPO document. One basic document was used over and over again and none the reproductions were ever sent as telegrams by the GPO."

Wrong! There's an example of this exact design in the V & A from 1965, so it is contemporary:

https://collections.vam.ac.uk/item/O158349/greetings-telegram-telegram-saynor/

There are many others if you care to do some research.

I not that you switch tactic on getting found out on this and then try to discredit the content. You really are on a hiding to nothing on this one.

D Javu

21/4/2024 01:43:56 pm

I repeat the question from Chris Edwards, why was Jimmy Ross named in the Sunday Telegraph on 12th December 1965? After all, he was only invented in 1990!

Repeater

17/4/2024 06:58:13 pm

Posted by James McGregor on April 9, 2024, 5:55 pm, in reply to " Re: Raddio Caroline 648khz "
Hi Garry, great to see the board being used. Lets see lots more content about Caroline please

The basic story has been online free of charge since 2009 link

17/4/2024 08:56:46 pm

Anoraks jeer that Haggerly will never, ever publish his story, but he did that back in 2009 and it has been available free to read since then.

But a problem emerged in 2014 with the reading of page 279 of 'Radio Man' and this has led to a major new investigation since that time. But the specific details in the 2009 monograph are correct - but incomplete.

Now the missing story about Caroline's identity has been discovered and they will be revealed why the real Caroline disappeared. A hint. It seemed at first go that what Beatrix Miller described in her 'Caroline' Style Sheet, and what Sir Clement Freud wrote about Caroline being a sexual slut, refer to the same story. They do not.

The real Caroline disappeared because Clement Freud (and many other people associated with Radio Caroline), were Jimmy Saville clones who thought that all young girls were living, breathing sex dolls with insertion points, ready for their taking and penetrating.

Now we know that some of these disgusting people didn't even care if the human doll was alive or dead. Well, Clement Freud, the man who turned Beatrix Miller's Caroline Style Sheet into his Caroline Sex Sheet, was just another of the dirty, nasty, horrible, revolting people who got grafted on to Ronan O'Rahilly's criminal operation - which the business side tried to shake off without success.

Anoraks, you are defending a disgusting criminal and abusive operation by supporting the invented centenary of Radio Caroline run by Malcolm Smith.

It is time to shut him, along with all of the people like Ray Clark who are publishing a deceitful account of the past.

BBC RADIO 4. What we know about you are Radio Reading's attack on Suffolk so far. Lord Cameroon will be flying out to Checkendon soon

19/4/2024 06:18:25 pm

Posted by Mike Simmonds on April 19, 2024, 2:57 pm, in reply to "Re: BBC Radio 4 Mw"
More Listeners, More Members, more money coming in, your so immature you lot, its all about you selfish lot in Suffolk that get a good signal.

More nonsense from Hagger

18/4/2024 02:53:40 pm

"many other people associated with Radio Caroline"

Name them.

"Anoraks, you are defending a disgusting criminal and abusive operation by supporting the invented centenary of Radio Caroline"

Absolutely not. There are reprehensible individuals who have been associated with many organisations and of course they should be held to account. However, support foe one enterprise or another does not in any way imply support for those particular people. This really does smack of desperation on your part.

"invented centenary"

A centenary is a 100 year anniversary, by the way, not 60.

The invented centenary of Radio Caroline

19/4/2024 08:40:48 pm

Once you know the MOTIVE behind the Malcolm Smith station you will know why the Smith 60 years is dependent upon you swallowing the BBC centenary lie.

The Crown idea is to shut up the residue of fools who believe in the Caroline myth involving Jimmy.

You obviously are a die-hard cult true believer who will never, every admit that you are believing a lie. The Flat Earth Society also needs members, and so does the group who do not believe that human beings ever landed on the Moon.

Clutching at straws

20/4/2024 10:01:55 am

And what might that motive be? Pray tell.

Ah, so it's the Crown who want to silence the 'fools who believe in the Caroline myth'? I thought that was you.

And unlike you I do not believe in accusations and conspiracy theories, shoehorned into an agenda of hate.

Mervyn Hagger

19/4/2024 07:59:25 am

The reason why I BOUGHT Ray Clark's latest (2024) version of his book was to make sure that I had the latest (2024) version of the defense of Ronan O'Rahilly by Malcolm Smith and his anorak children.

It was akin to me asking the Defense in a court of law as Prosecutor, "Is this your final word?"

Now that I know what Ray Clark's final word is on behalf of Malcolm Smith and his tribe, I see no reason to hold back from blasting them as liars, thieves and nasty, twisted and disgusting people advancing a FAKE STORY to conceal a bunch of criminals (under English law, because that is where the offences took place,)

No matter how many FAKE telegrams and FAKE stories that DJS want to parrot, they cannot overcome one very basic flaw in the foundation of their lies. Their story hinges on Ian Cowper Ross who in 1990 invented his detailed 'Jimmy Ross' lie.

The anoraks, including Ray Clark, know that Ian's real father was named Charles because I BOUGHT a copy of Ian's MARRIAGE certificate from a UK government source. But I also know EVERYTHING about the Ross family and what his father did for a living. I also know EVERYTHING about Ian's step-brother who lived and worked on KING'S ROAD - Ian did not and Ian's step-brother wanted nothing to do with Ian.

Ian could not even get the name of the coffee shop on King's Road correct, it was NOT Kenya but KENCO! I researched that as well.

Ian was a stupid teenager who got hold of a classic motorbike and caused a road crash. Then he got hold of a Jensen car and his a bus head-on. That almost cost Ian his foot and he landed in hospital and then in court at DERBY.

Ian was fined and his father humiliated and so his Dad pulled some strings and got Ian a job as a dogsbody at Stevens Press Ltd (Jocelyn Stevens) because Stevens has also been a reckless driver when he was younger and Stevens was a director of a Norcros subsidiary - hence the combined connection to John Sheffield (his father-in-law).

But what of Ian's Dad? He was a director of Jensen for a time when Norcros bought its controlling shares - before dumping them and Jensen as a flop. But that was not Ian's father's main occupation. He was Sales Director for a Scottish firm that franchised dry cleaning and its boss relocated to England and Ian's father moved to Hindhead.

Ray Clark knows nothing of that.

Nor does Ray Clark know about the in-law connection between Ian and his aristocratic brother-in-law who was a part of the million-dollar swindle of the Beatles - which led to the suicide (maybe murder) of Brian Epstein and his solicitor who hung himself (murdered?)

Nor does Ray Clark know about the story behind the naming of 6 Chesterfield Gardens which goes back to the husband of Kitty Black and a PRIOR operation at a different location (2 minutes down the road from where Kitty was based with her show-biz, real estate husband.)

That is why I bought Ray Clark's 2024 rubbish. I wanted to be sure that he had not lifted our material (except for the name of Charles Ross which I discovered!), and that he had not revealed the real story behind the Caroline Kennedy myth, the story of Mandy Rice-Davies, the Krays, and the New York / New Jersey Mafia - or how all of it links back to Falkirk in Scotland!

For the details (and I do mean DETAILS), you will have to wait for the publication of 'Dial 999 for Caroline' narrated by Genie Baskir. It is at present a work in progress that will shortly appear in conjunction with the ongoing story about the Post Office Scandal which has now been shown in the USA where Genie lives.

But the final word from Ray Clark is that he is a 2024 self-confessed liar working for Malcolm Smith who is a 2024 swindler pushing a fraud to obtain money by false pretences. I can say that under my own name because I have the proof!

Your comment will be posted after it is approved.

Scotland's Woke Utopia In Context.

Leave a Reply.

Radio Now & Then

Archives

Categories